MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389974579 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.11313

Measurement of the Isolated Nuclear Two-Photon Decay in $^{72}\mathrm{Ge}$

2023· preprint· en· W4389974579 on OpenAlexaff
D. Freire-Fernández, W. Korten, R. J. Chen, S. Litvinov, Yu. A. Litvinov, M. S. Sanjari, H. Weick, F. C. Akinci, H. M. Albers, M. Armstrong, A. Banerjee, K. Blaum, C. Brandau, B. A. Brown, C. G. Bruno, J. Carroll, Xiangcheng Chen, Ch. J. Chiara, M. L. Cortés, S. Dellmann, I. Dillmann, D. Dmytriiev, O. Forstner, H. Geißel, J. Glorius, A. Görgen, M. Górska, C. J. Griffin, A. Gumberidze, S. Harayama, R. Heß, N. Hubbard, Kayo Ide, Ph. R. John, R. Joseph, B. Jurado, D. Kalaydjieva, K. Kanika, F. G. Kondev, P. Koseoglou, G. Košir, C. Kozhuharov, Iu. N. Kulikov, G. Leckenby, Birgit Lorenz, J. Marsh, A. Mistry, A. Ozawa, N. Pietralla, Zs. Podolyák, M. Polettini, M. Sguazzin, R. S. Sidhu, M. Steck, Th. Stöhlker, J. A. Swartz, J. Vesic, P. M. Walker, Takayuki Yamaguchi, R. Zidarova

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of VictoriaTRIUMF
FundersNuclear PhysicsBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of EnergyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateAtomic physicsPhotonExcitationElectronGamma rayPositronIonRadioactive decayEnergy (signal processing)Nuclear isomerNuclear physicsDecay schemeOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nuclear two-photon or double-gamma ($2γ$) decay is a second-order electromagnetic process whereby a nucleus in an excited state emits two gamma rays simultaneously. To be able to directly measure the $2γ$ decay rate in the low-energy regime below the electron-positron pair-creation threshold, we combined the isochronous mode of a storage ring with Schottky resonant cavities. The newly developed technique can be applied to isomers with excitation energies down to $\sim100$\,keV and half-lives as short as $\sim10$\,ms. The half-life for the $2γ$ decay of the first-excited $0^+$ state in bare $^{72}\mathrm{Ge}$ ions was determined to be $23.9\left(6\right)$\,ms, which strongly deviates from expectations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207