MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding in non-anticoagulated thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome patients: Prospective study from antiphospholipid syndrome alliance for clinical trials and international networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository (“Registry”)

2023· article· en· W4389974969 on OpenAlexaff
Cécile Yelnik, Zeynep Belce Erton, Élodie Drumez, Dachi Cheildze, Danieli Andrade, Ann E. Clarke, Maria G. Tektonidou, Savino Sciascia, José Pardos‐Gea, Vittorio Pengo, Guillermo Ruiz‐Irastorza, H. Michael Belmont, C. López-Pedrera, Paul R. Fortin, Denis Wahl, Maria Gerosa, Nina Kello, Flávio Signorelli, Tatsuya Atsumi, Lanlan Ji, Maria Efthymiou, D. Ware Branch, Cecilia Nalli, Esther Rodríguez-Almaraz, Michelle Petri, Ricard Cervera, Hui Shi, Yu Zuo, Bahar Artım-Esen, Guillermo Pons‐Estel, Rohan Willis, Megan R W Barber, Leslie Skeith, María Laura Bertolaccini, Hannah Cohen, Robert Roubey, Doruk Erkan

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesWeill Cornell MedicineWeill Cornell Medical College
KeywordsMedicineAntiphospholipid syndromeThrombosisClinical trialPost-thrombotic syndromeInternal medicineVenous thrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Arthritis and RheumatismSame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207