All Together We Can Read: A Programme Promoting Inclusion in Portuguese School Libraries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inclusion is highlighted by several international organisations as a priority to be takeninto account in each country's educational policies. Portugal has been following these guidelinesand commitments, publishing legislation with a comprehensive approach to the concept of‘inclusion’ and monitoring its implementation in educational communities. School libraries, asstructures of the Ministry of Education, integrate, in their action plans, reading promotion projectsaimed at specific audiences. The main aim is the integration of all students, creating conditions forthem to fully enjoy the benefits of reading. In this article, we present the results of the project "AllTogether We Can Read", implemented in 62 schools over the last five years. Although there areareas for improvement, the evaluation reports point to a strong impact of the project in improvingstudent learning and af irming the school library as a structure for pedagogical innovation andknowledge induction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it