MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389979660 · doi:10.19136/era.a10n3.3687

Colección de polen, desarrollo de colonias y parámetros ambientales en abejas Scaptotrigona hellwegeri (Hymenoptera: Meliponini)

2023· article· es· W4389979660 on OpenAlexaff
Francisca Contreras-Escareño, Andrea Judith Betancourt-Sánchez, José Octavio Macías-Macías, José María Tapia-González, José Carlos Tapia-Rivera, Ernesto Guzmán‐Novoa

Bibliographic record

VenueEcosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se estudió la recolección de polen, la influencia de parámetros ambientales y la ganancia de peso en colonias de Scaptotrigona hellwegeri. Se registró la entrada de abejas con polen por 5 min cada hora en el periodo diurno de manera quincenal durante 9 meses. Se determinó la hora de inicio, finalización y periodo del día en que las abejas estuvieron ingresando más polen. Los parámetros ambientales se relacionaron con la recolección de polen y las colonias se pesaron mensualmente. La hora de inicio y finalización de recolección de polen fue a las 8:00 y 21:00 h, con un pico de colecta entre las 11:00 y las 17:00 h. La temperatura, intensidad de luz, humedad relativa y velocidad del viento, tuvieron una relación moderada con la actividad de colecta. En enero las colonias presentaron un ligero aumento de peso y en enero y mayo se observó una mayor recolección de polen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcosistemas y Recursos AgropecuariosSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207