MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389979805 · doi:10.53063/synsint.2023.34190

Characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite synthesized from eggshells for absorption of heavy metals

2023· article· en· W4389979805 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Leila Karamzadeh, Esmaeil Salahi, Iman Mobasherpour, Armin Rajabi, Masomeh Javaheri

Bibliographic record

VenueSynthesis and Sintering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFourier transform infrared spectroscopyMaterials scienceMesoporous materialScanning electron microscopeAtomic absorption spectroscopyAbsorption (acoustics)Aqueous solutionAdsorptionChemical engineeringParticle sizeDeposition (geology)Nuclear chemistryNano-Specific surface areaNanometreAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MetalMineralogyChemistryMetallurgyEnvironmental chemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the synthesis of nano hydroxyapatite using deposition process and eggshell as a cost-effective starting material. This study investigates its potential as an effective adsorbent for heavy metals. Various analytical techniques, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), surface area measurement (BET), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), were used to characterize the composition. The main objective was to evaluate the suitability of the synthesized hydroxyapatite as a heavy metal adsorbent in aqueous solutions. The results of this research showed that hydroxyapatite, which has a particle size in the range of nanometers and a specific area of 150 square meters per gram, and has the necessary properties for absorption, was successfully processed. The results showed that the prepared samples had a uniform mesopore distribution between 2 and 3 nm and 6 and 20 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynthesis and SinteringSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207