Pseudo-random Instance Generators in C++ for Deterministic and Stochastic Multi-commodity Network Design Problems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network design problems constitute an important family of combinatorial optimization problems for which numerous exact and heuristic algorithms have been developed over the last few decades. Two central problems in this family are the multi-commodity, capacitated, fixed charge network design problem (MCFNDP) and its stochastic counterpart, the two-stage MCFNDP with recourse. These are standard problems that often serve as work benches for devising and testing models and algorithms in stylized but close-to-realistic settings. The purpose of this paper is to introduce two flexible, high-speed generators capable of simulating a wide range of settings for both the deterministic and stochastic MCFNDPs. We hope that, by facilitating systematic experimentation with new and larger sets of instances, these generators will lead to a more thorough assessment of the performance achieved by exact and heuristic solution methods in both deterministic and stochastic settings. We also hope that making these generators available will promote the reproducibility and comparability of published research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it