MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389986082 · doi:10.51952/9781529233551.ch006

Experiments in Practice: New Directions in Municipal Data Policy and Governance

2023· book-chapter· en· W4389986082 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Barns

Bibliographic record

VenueBristol University Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicData Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate governancePublic administrationPolitical scienceBusinessEnvironmental planningGeographyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What can be done to renegotiate data power in an era of platform scale? Data reforms enacted by cities such as Barcelona and Toronto, as well as new multi-city data alliances, demonstrate the role of local and municipal governments as key sites for data policy experimentation. This chapter explores some of the policies and programmes used to advance experimental data policies that respond to the extraction of data value by commercial platform business models, and discusses some of the emerging instruments used to advance citizen digital rights and urban data values. These experimental reforms, it argues, highlight the enduring importance of the city scale as a site for the renegotiation of data power in an era of platform scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.304
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.109 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBristol University Press eBooksSame topicData Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207