Advantage prioritization of digital carbon footprint awareness in optimized urban mobility using fuzzy Aczel Alsina based decision making
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
City governments prioritize mobility in urban planning and policy. Greater mobility in a city leads to happier citizens. Although enhanced urban mobility is helpful, it comes with costs, notably in terms of climate change. Transportation systems that enable urban mobility often emit greenhouse gases. Cities must prioritize digital carbon footprint awareness. Cities may reduce the environmental impact of urban mobility while keeping its benefits by close monitoring and reducing the carbon footprint of digital technologies like transportation applications, ride-sharing platforms, and smart traffic control systems. The aim is to advantage prioritize three alternatives, namely doing nothing, upgrading and optimizing data centers and networks, and using renewable energy sources for data centers and networks to minimize the digital carbon footprint using the proposed decision making tool. This study consists of two stages. In the first stage, fuzzy Aczel-Alsina functions (fuzzy Aczel-Alsina weighted assessment - ALWAS method) based Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) is proposed to find the weights of criteria. Secondly, fuzzy ALWAS Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) model is improved to evaluate and choose the best alternative among the three alternatives. The improved ALWAS-CoCoSo model enables flexible nonlinear processing of uncertain information and simulation of different risk levels. Besides, we proposed the improved fuzzy OPA algorithm for processing uncertain and incomplete information. The case study is provided to the decision-makers to advantage prioritize the alternatives based on twelve criteria organized into four aspects, including digital carbon footprint, externalities, technical capability, and economics. The ranking results reveal that A3=2.445 is the best among the three alternative, while A1=1.705 is the worst alternative. The results show that the best way to reduce the digital carbon footprint is to use renewable energy sources to power data centers and networks (A3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it