La citoyenneté empêchée ! Freins et leviers au droit de vote face au vieillissement et au handicap
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la littérature scientifique, l’existence d’un «disability gap» et la diminution de la participation électorale à partir de 80 ans ont souvent été traitées de manière séparée. Parce que ces deux phénomènes ont été étudiés parallèlement, les auteurs de cet article proposent un regard croisé entre les domaines du handicap et du vieillissement sur la question de l’exercice de la citoyenneté avec un attention plus particulière sur l abstention. L’article invite en substance à l’observation des convergences et divergences des obstacles au vote qui se manifestent dans les parcours biographiques des personnes âgées et/ou en situation de handicap. Loin de proposer une lecture dichotomique du sujet, il interroge aussi le caractère parfois flou des catégories en envisageant notamment les cas spécifiques des personnes âgées en situation de handicap, ainsi que des personnes en situation de handicap vieillissantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".