MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389998606 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100643

A Novel Multifunctional Assistive Device for Enhancing Mobility and Social Distancing Compliance among Visually Impaired Individuals

2023· article· en· W4389998606 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hamed A. Mahmood, Mohammad Mohammad, A. Saeed, Mohammad Abbas

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompliance (psychology)Visually impairedSocial distanceDistancingAssistive technologyPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationHuman–computer interactionMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Computer scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global population of visually impaired individuals continues to rise, as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO).The widespread prevalence of visual impairments necessitates innovative solutions for overcoming challenges related to spatial navigation and obstacle avoidance.This study introduces a multifunction assistive device, designed to augment safety measures and mobility for visually impaired individuals by acting as an artificial vision unit that issues cautionary alerts.The device is comprised of an array of sensors, microcontrollers, and wearable gadgets, providing immediate assistance to its users.Three primary components form the system: a smart glove, a smart shoe, and a smart hat.Insight obstacles are detected by the smart glove, which subsequently alerts the user.Ground obstacles, slopes, and wet surfaces are identified by the smart shoe.The smart hat is equipped with features that facilitate social distancing, maintaining a minimum distance of 2 meters to prevent viral infection, such as that of the Coronavirus, and enhance visibility at night.Users receive system notifications through sound or vibration.System evaluation demonstrated a high detection accuracy ranging from 95% to 99% in ambient obstacle detection, ensuring efficient obstacle avoidance and enhanced personal safety.Furthermore, the equipment effectively alerted users to maintain a safe social distance during the COVID-19 epidemic.A comparative analysis with existing assistive systems revealed that the proposed system offers a broad spectrum of functionalities, including obstacle collision avoidance, flame detection, water collision avoidance, hole detection, day and night visibility, and social distancing alerts.The proposed assistive device represents a practical, affordable, and transportable solution that empowers visually impaired individuals by promoting independence and enhancing overall mobility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicTactile and Sensory InteractionsFrench-language works237,207