MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390000028 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100603

Modelling and Analysis of Vaccination Effects on Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Transmission Dynamics

2023· article· en· W4390000028 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aakash Mohandoss, Gunasundari Chandrasekar, Rashid Jan

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission (telecommunications)Disease transmissionFoot-and-mouth diseaseVaccinationDynamics (music)Hand-foot-and-mouth diseaseDiseasePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineVirologyComputer sciencePhysicsOutbreakTelecommunicationsAcousticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the transmission dynamics of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), incorporating vaccination, were comprehensively assessed.A Susceptible-Vaccinated-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SVEIR) model was formulated and its stability was evaluated in relation to disease-free and endemic equilibrium points.The fundamental reproduction number, R0, was derived utilizing the Next-Generation Matrix method.This work demonstrates the local and global asymptotic stability of both disease-free and endemic equilibria under defined conditions.The local stability of the disease-free equilibrium set was ascertained via the Jacobian matrix method, contingent upon certain prerequisites.Conversely, the stability of the endemic equilibrium set was affirmed using the Routh-Hurwitz criteria.In the context of global stability, a Lyapunov function was employed to establish the disease-free equilibrium case, demonstrating that the equilibrium E0 is globally asymptotically stable within region Ω.Stability of the endemic equilibrium set for the susceptible and infected compartments was exhibited using Dulac's criteria.Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed, revealing a significant correlation of the basic reproduction number to specific parameters, namely A, β1, β2, β3, β4, and ρ.This analysis indicates that these aforementioned parameters have a substantial influence on HFMD propagation.The analytical findings were corroborated through numerical simulations which further reinforced the validity of the model.This work presents a profound exploration of HFMD transmission dynamics, offering valuable insights for the development of efficacious control strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207