MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390007125 · doi:10.3389/fsysb.2023.1347323

Editorial: Integrative systems biology and big data for agricultural improvement and understanding

2023· editorial· en· W4390007125 on OpenAlexaff
Liliana Fadul-Pacheco, Antony T. Vincent, Éric R. Paquet

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Systems Biology · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMinistry of Agriculture, Fisheries and FoodSte. Anne's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataAgricultureVolume (thermodynamics)Systems biologyData scienceComputer scienceBiologyComputational biologyEcologyPhysicsData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editorial on the Research Topic Integrative systems biology and big data for agricultural improvement and understandingIn the modern age, the agriculture industry faces the dual challenge of feeding an increasing global population and doing so sustainably.Meeting this challenge requires a more global understanding of biological systems.Integrative Systems Biology, a multidisciplinary approach that combines biology, genomics, and data analysis, has emerged as a powerful tool for improving agriculture and our comprehension of its biological components.Agriculture has come a long way since the days of subsistence farming.Today, it is a complex web of interconnected factors, where crop yields, climate change, and environmental sustainability intersect.To navigate this complexity, Integrative Systems Biology allows us to study the intricate relationships within ecosystems, from the molecular level up to the farm scale.One pivotal facet of this paradigm shift is the exploration of microbiomes-complex communities of microorganisms that play a fundamental role in shaping the health, productivity, and sustainability of agricultural ecosystems.This Research Topic delves into the realm of systems biology with a keen focus on microbiomes, leveraging high-throughput sequencing technologies to unravel the mysteries hidden within diverse agricultural domains.High-throughput sequencing, a revolutionary tool in genomics, has paved the way for a comprehensive exploration of microbial communities at unprecedented scales.This Research Topic embarks on an exploration journey across various agricultural landscapes, namely, forage systems, raw milk production, swine industry, and maple syrup production.Each of these fields represents a unique microcosm where the delicate balance of microbial interactions significantly influences the outcomes in terms of yield, quality, and overall system resilience.This Research Topic aims to bridge the gap between traditional agricultural practices and cutting-edge molecular technologies, emphasizing the importance of systems biology and high-throughput sequencing in shaping the future of sustainable and resilient agricultural systems.Specifically, here is a summary of the content covered by the different research papers:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Systems BiologySame topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207