MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390013180 · doi:10.34133/space.0103

Pre-Coded Inter-Satellite Routing Algorithm with Load Balancing for Mega-Constellation Networks

2023· article· en· W4390013180 on OpenAlexaff
Chi Zhang, Quan Chen, Zuping Tang, Jiaolong Wei, Gaoyang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Science & Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSatellite constellationConstellationComputer scienceMega-Routing algorithmSatelliteLoad balancing (electrical power)Computer networkAlgorithmRouting (electronic design automation)Distributed computingRouting protocolGeographyEngineeringGeodesyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to achieve global multiple seamless coverage, space-based internet usually adopts low Earth orbit (LEO) mega-constellation networks structure, which has the characteristics of high network topology dynamics, limited on-board computing and storage capacity, and uneven distribution of ground traffic. Such features may cause problems such as high transmission delay, network congestion and link interruption. Establishing a stable, efficient and balanced satellite communication link can effectively alleviate the performance of the transmission delay, load balancing, and network throughput. Taking advantage of the regularity of network topology, a pre-coded inter-satellite routing algorithm with load balancing is proposed, which includes 3 parts: (a) the routing sequence coding method and the concept of gateway satellite Service Region (GSSR) are proposed; (b) the initial routing sequence of GSSR is generated based on the maximum network flow method under the ideal situation of uniform satellite traffic distribution; (c) aiming at the uneven distribution of traffic, the Sinkhorn algorithm is used to improve the load balancing performance of inter-satellite links. Simulation results show that, for the Starlink Group-4 constellation, the proposed method can maintain a low transmission delay and improve the load balancing together with the network throughout performance with minimal hops and low time complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpace Science & TechnologySame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207