MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390014769 · doi:10.3390/ecsa-10-16009

Optimizable Ensemble Regression for Arousal and Valence Predictions from Visual Features

2023· article· en· W4390014769 on OpenAlexafffund
Itaf Omar Joudeh, Ana-Maria Creţu, Stéphane Bouchard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsValence (chemistry)ArousalComputer scienceConcordance correlation coefficientArtificial intelligenceCorrelationMean squared errorRegressionCorrelation coefficientPearson product-moment correlation coefficientMachine learningSpeech recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)StatisticsMathematicsPsychologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cognitive state of a person can be categorized using the Circumplex model of emotional states, a continuous model of two dimensions: arousal and valence. We exploit the Remote Collaborative and Affective Interactions (RECOLA) database, which includes audio, video, and physiological recordings of interactions between human participants to predict arousal and valance values using machine learning techniques. To allow learners to focus on the most relevant data, features are extracted from raw data. Such features can be predesigned or learned. Learned features are automatically learned and utilized by deep learning solutions. Predesigned features are calculated before machine learning and inputted into the learner. Our previous work on video recordings focused on learned features. In this paper, we expand our work onto predesigned visual features, extracted from video recordings. We process these features by applying time delay and sequencing, arousal/valence labelling, and shuffling and splitting. We then train and test regressors to predict arousal and valence values. Our results outperform those from the literature. We achieve a root mean squared error (RMSE), Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC), and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.1033, 0.8498, and 0.8001 on arousal predictions; and 0.07016, 0.8473, and 0.8053 on valence predictions, using an optimizable ensemble, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207