MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390021970 · doi:10.7202/1106942ar

Automobile Insurance in British Columbia:Autoplan Turns Thirty

2023· article· en· W4390021970 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Denis Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueAssurances et gestion des risques · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInsurance and Financial Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderinsuredClosing (real estate)Automobile insuranceLiability insuranceAccident insuranceBusinessStatutory lawActuarial scienceInsurance policyCasualty insuranceGeneral insuranceLiabilityCrashFinanceLawHealth insurancePolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the five components of “Autoplan” insurance. This is the commercial name given to the universal automobile insurance regime that has been available in British Columbia since March of 1974. The minimum package comes with the following coverage: (1) third party liability insurance; (2) statutory accident benefits; (3) uninsured motorist protection; (4) underinsured motorist protection; and (5) inverse liability insurance. In closing, the article describes the main restrictions placed on recovery that relate to the conduct of the insured person.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAssurances et gestion des risquesSame topicInsurance and Financial Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207