MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390022937 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100623

A Novel Approach of 1-D Cellular Automata in Cryptosystem

2023· article· en· W4390022937 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryptosystemCellular automatonComputer scienceTheoretical computer scienceCryptographyArtificial intelligenceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryptosystems worldwide employ techniques for the encryption and decryption of sensitive data, relying extensively on secret keys.In this context, the generation of a randomized, secured secret key and its size hold paramount significance in ensuring confidentiality, data integrity, and resistance to a plethora of security attacks, rendering it arduous for potential intruders to predict key sequences.This study aims to generate the highly secured randomized secret key, minimize the time complexity and ensure efficiency of the cryptosystem.In the key generation methodology presented, a novel approach was introduced, taking into account the receiver's credentials and employing the elementary cellular automata (CA).Rule 150 of CA was strategically leveraged to generate a secret key, undergoing numerous iterations to bolster security, intricacy, and to compound the predictability challenge of the key.Python was the chosen medium for the implementation of the proposed model.Time complexity was rigorously evaluated, and a comparative analysis was conducted against established cryptographic algorithms, notably Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) and Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), to ascertain efficiency.Subsequently, a frequency analysis, underpinned by a letter frequency distribution chart, was undertaken to confirm the randomness of the resultant ciphertext (CT).To further validate the robustness of the proposed model, security assessments encompassing brute force attacks, CT attacks, known plaintext (PT) attacks, and chosen PT attacks were meticulously examined.Cumulative findings corroborate the heightened security and efficiency of the proposed model in contrast to its predecessors.Anticipated future research horizons include the potential incorporation of CA in domains such as image and video encryption, blockchain technology, cryptocurrency, and digital signatures, aiming to cultivate superior security infrastructures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it