Effect of Double Porous Layer on Rough Step Slider Bearing Lubricated with Couple Stress Fluid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An investigation into how a double porous layer at the base impacts the performance of a Rayleigh step slider bearing lubricated with couple stress fluid is presented.The bearing is considered to be rough in nature.The modified Darcy's law is used to express the fluid pressure in the porous regions.To estimate the effect of surface roughness of the bearing the random variables pertaining to roughness parameters are analysed applying the Christen'S stochastic model.Applying Stokes' micro-continuum theory for couple stress yields an estimation of pressure via a modified Reynolds equation.Integrating over the bearing length the estimated film pressure, the load carrying capacity or lifting force, frictional force and coefficient of friction are incorporated into the study.A comparison to a single porous layer underscores the superior efficiency offered by the double porous layer.The study further elucidates the most favourable inlet film height and the optimal bearing length that facilitate maximum load carrying capacity.It is evident that the inlet film thickness can be reached the maximum up to 1.8 to 2 to obtain the maximum load carrying capacity of the bearing.The present study is compared with the existent results and that is more efficient for the current bearing model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".