MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390031504 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100624

Performance Investigation of RIS Aided Localization with TDoA in the Near-Field

2023· article· en· W4390031504 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdulrahman Kh. Alhafid, Y. E. Mohammed Ali, Sedki Younis

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultilaterationField (mathematics)Computer scienceGeologyAcousticsMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) are forecasted to assume a pivotal role in future wireless communication systems, largely attributed to their capacity to dynamically alter the propagation environment.This study primarily concentrates on the utilization of large RIS, leading to near-field propagation channels, especially in high-frequency communication systems.This is aimed at resolving the complex issue of single anchor-based localization, particularly under conditions where the line-ofsight (LoS) path is prone to severe blockage and fading.In this context, a millimeterwave localization problem, based on time difference of arrival (TDoA), utilizing orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) downlink signaling, has been modeled and simulated.The time of arrivals (ToA) measurements, enriched from each RIS tile, are applied to determine user positions.It is recognized that some ToA readings may possess low signal to noise ratio (SNR), making them unsuitable for inclusion in the estimation.Subsequently, various scenarios for RIS tile selection were examined in this research, with the aim of enhancing localization accuracy.Numerical results substantiate the efficacy of the TDoA-RIS algorithm in improving localization accuracy.This is achieved through different strategies to select the most reliable 50% of ToA measurements for the formulation of the estimation procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207