Pangenome comparison of <i>Bacteroides fragilis</i> genomospecies unveil genetic diversity and ecological insights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Bacteroides fragilis is a Gram-negative commensal bacterium commonly found in the human colon that differentiates into two genomospecies termed division I and II. We leverage a comprehensive collection of 694 B. fragilis whole genome sequences and report differential gene abundance to further support the recent proposal that divisions I and II represent separate species. In division I strains, we identify an increased abundance of genes related to complex carbohydrate degradation, colonization, and host niche occupancy, confirming the role of division I strains as gut commensals. In contrast, division II strains display an increased prevalence of plant cell wall degradation genes and exhibit a distinct geographic distribution, primarily originating from Asian countries, suggesting dietary influences. Notably, division II strains have an increased abundance of genes linked to virulence, survival in toxic conditions, and antimicrobial resistance, consistent with a higher incidence of these strains in bloodstream infections. This study provides new evidence supporting a recent proposal for classifying divisions I and II B. fragilis strains as distinct species, and our comparative genomic analysis reveals their niche-specific roles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".