Этнокультурные аспекты феминистского движения в странах Глобального Юга Ethnocultural Aspects of the Feminist Movement in the Global South
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье рассматриваются особенности феминистского движения в различных этнокультурных средах стран Азии, Африки и Латинской Америки (Глобальный Юг) на протяжении нескольких десятилетий ХХ и начала ХХI веков. Фокус исследовательского внимания сосредоточен на процессах формирования различных видов гендерной идентичности в рамках как региональных, так и мировых феминистских течений. Основу изложенного материала составляет анализ позиций представителей различных волн мирового феминистского движения и результатов проведения четырех крупнейших Женских форумов, проходивших под эгидой ООН в 1975 г. (Мексика), в 1980 г. (Копенгаген), в 1985 г. (Найроби), в 1995 г. (Пекин). Особое внимание уделено фактографическим данным, опубликованным в рамках справочного документа, подготовленного к 25-ой годовщине Женского форума в Пекине Максин Мулинье, (Maxine Molyneux), Малу А. С. Гато (Malu A. C. Gatto) и Адрихой Дэй (Adrija Day), и изложенного в виде «Политической декларации» в марте 2020 г. на 64-ой Сессии Комиссии по положению женщин (Political declaration 2020). Сравнительный анализ документов и опубликованных интервью позволил автору данной статьи сделать вывод об основных тенденциях формирования новой гендерной идентичности среди населения стран Азии, Африки и Латинской Америки на современном этапе. The article examines the feminist movement in various ethnocultural environments in Asia, Africa and Latin America (Global South) over several decades of the 20th – early 21st centuries. The research is focused on the formation of various types of gender identity within both regional and global feminist movements. The work is based on the analysis of various waves of the world feminist movement and the results of the four largest Women's Forums held under the auspices of the UN in 1975 (Mexico), 1980 (Copenhagen), 1985 (Nairobi) and 1995 (Beijing). Particular attention is paid to the data published as background paper prepared for the 25th anniversary of the Beijing Women's Forum by Maxine Molyneux, Malu A.C. Gatto and Adrija Day, and adopted as a political declaration at the 64th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women in March 2020 (Political declaration 2020). A comparative analysis of documents and published interviews allowed the author of this article to draw a conclusion about the main trends in the formation of new gender identities among the population of Asia, Africa, and Latin America at present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it