MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Balancing Power

2023· article· en· W4390055859 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Martins

Bibliographic record

VenueEncounters in Theory and History of Education · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports and Physical Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeautyMoment (physics)ElitePower (physics)GestureAestheticsArtAdvertisingPolitical scienceLawComputer scienceBusinessComputer visionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Balancing Power is a screen-print regarding the juxtaposition of brutality and beauty. The figures in the print are two elite mixed martial artists who, upon completion of their fight, bow down to one another with a regal respect. In the background are fireweeds, a plant that grows rampant after a major forest fire in areas of North America. The presence of fireweeds and the gesture of respect after a fight share the same characteristic as they are both a moment of beauty after a moment of intense brutality. It is only in the moments of bad we appreciate the moments of good so much more.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncounters in Theory and History of EducationSame topicSports and Physical Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207