Transdisciplinarity and the Curriculum: Reading UNESCO’s “Reimagining Our Futures Together” with Transdisciplinarity in Mind
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper delves into the concept of transdisciplinarity and its potential application in education by conducting a critical analysis of UNESCO's report titled "Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education." The report emphasizes the pressing need to address existential risks and climate change, thereby advocating for transformative educational practices. The paper explores the historical development of transdisciplinarity, encompassing structuralist-systems, holistic, and postmodern approaches. Using a transdisciplinary lens, the study examines crucial themes from the UNESCO report, including ecological, intercultural, and interdisciplinary learning integration, the concept of the Knowledge Commons, and the proposition for a new social contract between individuals and governments. This examination serves as an exemplar of how to interpret and question educational texts through a transdisciplinary perspective. Keywords: transdisciplinarity, transdisciplinary education, UNESCO reports, educational policy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".