Towards automated sleep-stage classification for adaptive deep brain stimulation targeting sleep in patients with Parkinson’s disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sleep dysfunction affects over 90% of Parkinson’s disease patients. Recently, subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation has shown promise for alleviating sleep dysfunction. We previously showed that a single-layer neural network could classify sleep stages from local field potential recordings in Parkinson’s disease patients. However, it was unable to categorise non-rapid eye movement into its different sub-stages. Here we employ a larger hidden layer network architecture to distinguish the substages of non-rapid eye movement with reasonable accuracy, up to 88% for the lightest substage and 92% for deeper substages. Using Shapley attribution analysis on local field potential frequency bands, we show that low gamma and high beta are more important to model decisions than other frequency bands. These results suggest that the proposed neural network-based classifier can be employed for deep brain stimulation treatment in commercially available devices with lower local field potential sampling frequencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it