MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390059235 · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49898-1

Tailoring ultrabroadband near‐infrared luminescence in Bi-doped germanosilicate glasses

2023· article· en· W4390059235 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Mehaboob, V. Fuertes, V.A.G. Rivera, Younès Messaddeq

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLuminescenceMaterials scienceDopingBroadbandWavelengthOptoelectronicsInfraredOptical fiberIonNear-infrared spectroscopyOpticsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bi-doped glasses and optical fibers are extensively studied since they present broadband optical amplification in the near-infrared region (NIR), in which the optical telecommunication industry greatly depends for the transmission of optical signals. There are many scientific challenges about the NIR luminescent emissions from Bi ions, such as understanding its origin and further improving the associated optical amplification capacity. In this work, Bi-doped germanosilicate glass compositions with ultrabroadband NIR luminescence were fabricated, in the range of 925–1630 nm, which covers O, E, S, C, and L-telecommunication bands. An in-depth analysis of the impact of modifying excitation wavelengths, Bi content, and GeO2/SiO2 concentration ratio in the glass matrix demonstrates the possibility of considerably manipulating the Bi NIR luminescence, in terms of tuning emission parameters such as bandwidth, up to ~ 490 nm, and luminescence intensity. Based on theoretical and experimental luminescence data retrieved from the fabricated glasses, we demonstrate that the origin of broadband luminescence under all the considered excitation wavelengths can be ascribed to optical transitions of Bi0 ions. Therefore, an energy level diagram for Bi0 is proposed. We anticipate that our findings can provide clarifications to the existing uncertainty in the origin of Bi NIR emission, which will be useful to fabricate efficient future optical fiber amplifiers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicGlass properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207