MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390071945 · doi:10.1109/iccsm60247.2023.00019

Hybrid Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization for Speech Emotion Classification

2023· article· en· W4390071945 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationDifferential evolutionComputer scienceDifferential (mechanical device)Artificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionMulti-swarm optimizationMetaheuristicMachine learningEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel evolutionary-based hybridization approach for speech emotion classification. This approach is based on two optimization algorithms: differential evolution (DE) and particle swarm optimization (PSO), using three types of acoustics features to represent and explore a ‘tri-population’ environment. Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), prosodic features, and auditory-based parameters are considered to compose each population, respectively. The hybridization of PSO and DE methods, as well as the relevance of acoustic representation techniques, are investigated to provide the most effective configuration for speech emotion classification. Evaluation experiments are carried out using the Emotional Prosody Speech and Transcripts, and the support vector machine (SVM) as an objective function. The results showed that the PSO-DE-PSO hybrid method achieves the best performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it