MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390074968 · doi:10.59876/a-rmzd-2pkn

Perceived employability, job crafting and career success: the case of young professionals in Vietnam

2023· article· en· W4390074968 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ngoan Thi Dinh

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Employability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceEmployabilityHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to investigate whether career competencies could enhance young professionals’ perceived employability via job crafting and career success. 1008 respondents from different companies in Vietnam answered an online survey with 957 valid answers. Partial least square structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the measurement and structural models and examine the mediating role of career success and job crafting. The results of the study were significant. First, career competencies directly affected both perceived internal and external employability, but the effect on the latter was stronger. Second, career success partially mediates the relationship between career competencies and perceived internal employability. However, career success was not related to perceived external employability. Third, job crafting partially mediates the relationship between career competencies and perceived employability. Nevertheless, the mediating role of job crafting between career competencies and perceived external employability is stronger. The study extends the previous literature on employability to a personal perspective with the effects of personal resources through personal adaptation and personal success leading to HR management indications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement internationalSame topicHigher Education and EmployabilityFrench-language works237,207