MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390078043 · doi:10.4153/s0008439523000991

Tree structure of spectra of spectral Moran measures with consecutive digits

2023· article· en· W4390078043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Henan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsOrthonormal basisCombinatoricsCharacterization (materials science)Tree (set theory)Sequence (biology)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let $\{b_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty }$ be a sequence of integers larger than 1. We will study the harmonic analysis of the equal-weighted Moran measures $\mu _{\{b_n\},\{{\mathcal D}_n\}}$ with ${\mathcal D}_n=\{0,1,2,\ldots ,q_n-1\}$ , where $q_n$ divides $b_n$ for all $n\geq 1.$ In this paper, we first characterize all the maximal orthogonal sets of $L^2(\mu _{\{b_n\},\{{\mathcal D}_n\}})$ via a tree mapping. By this characterization, we give some sufficient conditions for the maximal orthogonal set to be an orthonormal basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it