MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390078673 · doi:10.1017/s1355617723007798

4 Severity of Retinopathy of Prematurity and Motor Skills Development in Preschoolers

2023· article· en· W4390078673 on OpenAlexaff
Emma Giménez DeGeorge, Christina Dandar, Allyssa M. Mattes, Andrew M. Heitzer, Jamie Piercy, Brittany Paul, Christina Lee, Judith Klarr, Sarah Raz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinopathy of prematurityMedicinePediatricsCerebral palsyMotor skillGestationNeonatal intensive care unitGestational ageRetinopathyPregnancyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective: Children born preterm are at increased risk of deviation from the typical developmental trajectory. The probability of adverse developmental sequelae is increased in those with history of major perinatal complications. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a pathological disordered growth of retinal blood vessels occurring in very preterm neonates who require supplemental oxygen. ROP has been linked to intermittent hypoxemic events and blood gas derangements occurring in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), particularly in ventilated infants. Though presence and severity of ROP have been linked to neurodevelopmental impairment, little is known about the relationship between ROP severity and motor development in the preschool age. Because the same hypoxemic events and blood gas changes that lead to severe ROP may also lead to greater developmental deficits in motor control, we hypothesized that ROP severity will be inversely linked to the quality of motor functioning even in NICU graduates without neurological impairments. Participants and Methods: We included 95 preterm (23.6 - 33.6 weeks gestation) preschoolers (49 females, 44 members of twin pairs or triplets). The participants' age ranged from 3.3 - 4.1 years (adjusted for prematurity). ROP screening was conducted during NICU stay and rated from immature retina (0) to grade 4. Motor abilities were assessed with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2). Cases with diagnosed perinatal brain pathology (moderate to severe) or cerebral palsy were excluded from analyses. Results: We used linear mixed regression analyses with multiple gestation as a random factor. Severity of ROP was our predictor of interest, whereas socioeconomic status, sex, gestational age, and birth-weight SD served as covariates. Separate analyses were conducted using the PDMS-2 Total Motor, Fine Motor, and Gross Motor Quotients as dependent variables. ROP severity explained a unique portion of the variance in the Total Motor Quotient (F[1, 89] = 5.59, p = .02). Examination of the relationship between ROP severity and motor skill domains yielded a significant association for the Fine Motor Quotient (F[1, 89] = 6.19, p = .015) and a trend for the Gross Motor Quotient (F[1, 89] = 3.64, p = .06). Conclusions: The results of this study reveal that increase in ROP severity is linked to poorer motor skills in preterm-born preschoolers without major disabilities or perinatal diagnosis of moderate to severe brain pathology. This association was evident for both fine and gross motor skills, though only the relationship between ROP severity and the former motor index reached conventional statistical significance. Importantly, ROP severity accounted for a unique portion of the variance in motor performance, over and above the variance explained by other perinatal risk factors. This result is consistent with previous research findings indicating that ROP is linked to the occurrence of multiple, subtle hypoxemic events and 'exposure' to blood gas derangements during NICU stay in very preterm neonates who require respiratory support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the International Neuropsychological SocietySame topicRetinopathy of Prematurity StudiesFrench-language works237,207