1 Social Brain Network Connectivity Relates to Social and Adaptive Outcomes Following Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a prevalent cause of long-term morbidity in children and adolescents and can lead to persistent difficulties with social and behavioral function. TBI may impact brain structures that support social cognition, social perception, and day-to-day social interactions—termed the social brain network (SBN). We examined differences in links among the SBN and regions of interest from other neural networks thought to support social outcomes, i.e., the default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN). Furthermore, we examined how differences in co-activation among the SBN and these other key networks were associated with ratings of social and day-to-day adaptive outcomes. Participants and Methods: Participants included children and adolescents with moderate to severe TBI (msTBI; n=11, Mage=11.78, 6 male), complicated-mild TBI (cmTBI; n=12, Mage=12.59, 9 male), and orthopedic injury (OI; n=22, Mage=11.69, 15 male). Participants underwent resting-state functional MRI on a 3Tesla Siemens Prisma scanner. Parents rated their child’s social and adaptive function on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Third Edition (ABAS-3). Resting-state connectivity was assessed using the CONN Toolbox, including preprocessing, denoising, and alignment to the participants’ processed T1 MPRAGE sequence followed by seed-to-voxel analysis using a SBN mask and targeted regions of interest within the DMN and SN. Individual-level r-to-z correlations were extracted from resulting clusters of co-activation with the SBN mask and exported into SPSSv28.0 for integration with behavioral data. Results: One-way ANOVAs used to examine group differences in social and adaptive outcome revealed significant group differences in CBCL Social Competence (F=4.49, p=.019) and all composite scores on the ABAS-3 (Fs=3.78 to 5.17, ps=.031 to .010). In each domain, children with msTBI were rated as having elevated difficulties relative to cmTBI or OI, whereas cmTBI and OI groups did not differ. Connectivity also differed significantly between groups, with children with OI demonstrating greater connectivity between the SBN and the anterior cingulate cortex of the SN (t=5.19, p(FDR)<.0001) and posterior cingulate cortex of the DMN (f=4.30, p(FDR)<.001) than children with msTBI. Children with cmTBI also showed greater connectivity between the SBN and left temporal pole of the DMN (t=7.45, p(FDR)<.000001) than children with msTBI. Degree of connectivity between the SBN and posterior cingulate was significantly positively correlated across all domains of adaptive function (rs=.451 to .504, ps=.010 to .003), whereas degree of connectivity between the SBN and left temporal pole was strongly positively related to Social Competence (a=.633, p=.006) and conceptual adaptive skills on the ABAS (A=.437, p=.037). Conclusions: Our findings provide insights into the neural substrates of social and adaptive morbidity after pediatric TBI, particularly msTBI, by linking alterations in connectivity among the SBN, DMN, and SN with measures of social and adaptive outcome. While the posterior cingulate was broadly associated with adaptive outcome, the temporal pole was particularly strongly associated with social competence. This may reflect the diverse functions and high degree of interconnectivity of the posterior cingulate, which contributes to various cognitive and attentional processes, relative to the strong amygdala/limbic connections of the temporal pole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".