89 A Pilot Study of a Parent-Delivered Game-Based Cognitive Intervention in Children Born Preterm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Preterm birth (gestational age < 37 weeks) is associated with delays in the development of executive functions and their precursors, including controlling attention and retaining task-relevant information. In the current study, we aim to examine the potential therapeutic effects of a novel cognitive tablet game, Dino Island (DI), and its implementation through a parent-delivered intervention program on cognitive development in preterm children. Participants and Methods: In total, 34 participants (M = 4.99 years old) were recruited from a perinatal follow-up clinic or through the community in Calgary, AB. Participants were randomly assigned to either the DI intervention (n = 20) or tablet-based educational control games (C; n = 14). Parents completed a 2-hour training program that included information about how to support their child through the intervention using behavioural supports and metacognitive strategies. Neuropsychological assessment was done prior to beginning the intervention and after 12 weeks of intervention. Various tests were used to assess near transfer measures of sustained attention, shifting attention, executive function, verbal working memory and inhibition, and to assess far transfer measures of language skills and early numeracy. Families tracked weekly progress using journals, with the goal of 3-4 30-minute sessions per week. Multiple ANCOVA analyses were run to analyze quantitative data using the pre-test score as a covariate. Results: A total of 21 participants completed the 12 weeks of intervention (DI: n = 11 and C: n = 10). Those who did not complete the intervention withdrew from the study or were unable to make a follow-up assessment due to COVID-19 restrictions. Groups did not significantly differ in age (DI: M = 4.92, C: M = 4.61), sex (DI: Female = 6, C: Female = 6), or in weeks preterm (DI: M = 29.49 weeks, C: M = 32.7 weeks). Multiple ANCOVAs were run to determine the effect of either the DI or Control intervention on the cognitive measures after controlling for the pre-intervention score of participants. As compared to the Control group, the DI intervention group showed near transfer gains in sustained attention (F(1,7) = 5.1, p = 0.043), and executive functions (F(2,18) = 5.41, p = 0.014), as well as far transfer gains in phonetic awareness (F(2,16) = 11.63, p = 0.001), vocabulary and oral language skills (F(2,7) = 5.54, p = 0.014), and number identification fluency (F(2,17) = 11.37, p = 0.001). Detailed analyses will be discussed in the poster. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary support for the potential efficacy of the DI intervention when delivered by parents to children born preterm. Pre-post testing after 12 weeks of intervention indicated both near and far transfer gains. These results highlight the benefits of utilizing a tablet game format to facilitate collaborative parent-child interactions in cognitive intervention. This intervention provides a potential affordable and engaging alternative to existing cognitive interventions. Further investigation with a larger and more diverse sample is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".