Analysing the distribution of SARS-CoV-2 infections in schools: integrating model predictions with real world observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract School closures were used as strategies to mitigate transmission in the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the nature of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks and the distribution of infections in classrooms could help inform targeted or ‘precision’ preventive measures and outbreak management in schools, in response to future pandemics. In this work, we derive an analytical model of Probability Density Function (PDF) of SARS-CoV-2 secondary infections and compare the model with infection data from all public schools in Ontario, Canada between September-December, 2021. The model accounts for major sources of variability in airborne transmission like viral load and dose-response (i.e., the human body’s response to pathogen exposure), air change rate, room dimension, and classroom occupancy. Comparisons between reported cases and the modeled PDF demonstrated the intrinsic overdispersed nature of the real-world and modeled distributions, but uncovered deviations stemming from an assumption of homogeneous spread within a classroom. The inclusion of near-field transmission effects resolved the discrepancy with improved quantitative agreement between the data and modeled distributions. This study provides a practical tool for predicting the size of outbreaks from one index infection, in closed spaces such as schools, and could be applied to inform more focused mitigation measures. Author summary At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was huge uncertainty around the risks of SARS-CoV-2 spread in classrooms. In the absence of early predictions surrounding classroom risks, many jurisdictions across countries closed in-person education. There is great interest in adopting a more ‘precision’ approach to better inform future interventions in the context of airborne virus risks. For this purpose, we need tools that can predict the probability of the size of outbreaks within classrooms along with the impact of interventions including masks, better ventilation, and physical distancing by limiting the number of students per classroom. To this end, we have developed a robust but practical model that yields the probability of secondary infections stemming from index cases occurring within schools on a given day. During model development, the major underlying physical and biological factors that dictate the disease transmission process, both at long-range and close-range, have been accounted for. This enables our model to modify its predictions for different scenarios - and possibly allows its use beyond schools. Finally, the model’s predictive capability has been verified by comparing its outputs with publicly available data on SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses in Ontario public schools. To our knowledge, this is the first time an analytical model derived from mostly first principles describes real-world infection distributions, satisfactorily. The quantitative match between the theoretical prediction and real-world data offers the proposed model as a possible powerful tool for better-informed precision pandemic mitigation strategies in indoor environments like schools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".