Gavin Butt, No Machos or Pop Stars: When the Leeds Art Experiment went Punk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
pas expliqué la raison pour laquelle des chapitres sont inclus sur certains pays ou régions, mais pas sur d'autres.Il aurait pu, par exemple, être imaginé que des articles traitent de l'Allemagne dans le contexte de la réconciliation franco-allemande -la maison Heinrich Heine ouvre ses portes en 1956, sept ans avant le traité de l'Élysée -, ou des maisons ou fondations sur lesquelles l'historiographie semble, à compulser la bibliographie, à peu près inexistante, comme celles de l'Inde (évoquée par Legrandjacques) ou des États-Unis, mais aussi des élèves-ingénieurs d'Art et Métier.Il n'en reste pas moins que cet ouvrage présente un apport majeur non seulement pour l'histoire de la Cité, mais plus généralement pour l'histoire transnationale et globale de l'enseignement supérieur et des mondes étudiants, champs de recherche dynamiques qu'il s'agit désormais d'approfondir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".