Zebulon Vance Miletsky, Before Busing: A History of Boston’s Long Black Freedom Struggle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carleton also draws upon Critical Indigenous Studies scholarship, Indigenous autobiographies, and published oral histories to illustrate "Indigenous Peoples challenging and talking back to the colonial archive" (12), thus highlighting acts of resistance of Indigenous families and communities against mandated schooling.Such resistance has often been omitted from mainstream narratives, leaving Canadians with questions about why Indigenous peoples "allowed" their children to be placed in schools against their will.In my view, Carleton has achieved what he set out to do with regard to the relationships he seeks to build with Indigenous peoples in the way that he has honoured our voices and perspectives.Furthermore, he engages in reciprocity with his willingness to share with others all that he has learned.According to Mi'kmaw scholar Marie Battiste, "We have all been marinated in Eurocentrism." 5This sentiment is often reflected in literature about colonialism along with its ability to permeate all aspects of our lives without our knowledge and aligns with Carleton's contention that "Schooling had a 'hidden curriculum,' or what [he calls] lessons in legitimacy: the formal and informal teachings that justified the colonial project and normalized unequal social relations of settler capitalism as commonsensical" (5).He then extends this claim to provide a roadmap for the reader to understand precisely how schooling in British Columbia has immersed us and therefore compelled us to become complicit in this narrative.Lessons in Legitimacy contains learning that I consider mandatory for any teacher education program in British Columbia.I hope that Dr. Carleton will consider adapting this book into a format, such as an article or podcast series, that maintains the key points about this time period in British Columbian history through the lens of schooling, models what can be learned from challenging colonial narratives, and amplifies voices that are usually omitted from these conversations.His contribution is imperative to both understanding education in British Columbia and improving schooling for Indigenous and all students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.038 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".