MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390084889 · doi:10.1017/s135561772300365x

47 Amyloid/Tau Ratio and Early Predictors of Alzheimer's Disease

2023· article· en· W4390084889 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shant Rising, Sung Jae Kim, Anne Nolty, Xianghong Arakaki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalifornia Verbal Learning TestNeuropsychologyCued recallPsychologyRecallFree recallAlzheimer's diseaseVerbal learningDiseaseCognitionDementiaEarly-onset Alzheimer's diseaseAudiologyMedicineClinical psychologyInternal medicinePsychiatryCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Early cognitive signs of Alzheimer's disease are often subtle and go unnoticed until they become more prominent and debilitating. Thus, symptoms begin long before an actual Alzheimer's diagnosis is given. However, it is known that cognitively healthy older individuals with lower amyloid/tau ratios (PAT) are more likely to develop Alzheimer's disease than those with higher amyloid/tau ratios (NAT). Therefore, we explored whether this ratio can be used in conjunction with neuropsychological tests to isolate cognitive predictors of Alzheimer's disease amongst cognitively healthy older adults. We were interested in potential group differences on the California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition (CVLT-II) Long Delay Free Recall scores and Cued Recall scores. We hypothesized that: (a) individuals in the PAT group would have weaker CVLT-II Long Delay Free Recall scores than individuals in the NAT group; and (b) individuals in the PAT group would recall fewer words on the CVLT-II Long Delay Cued Recall trial than individuals in the NAT group. Participants and Methods: There were 115 older individuals recruited via Huntington Medical Research Institutes and the University of Southern California who had their cerebral spinal fluid extracted to measure amyloid/tau ratios. They completed the California Verbal Learning Test-II as part of a larger neuropsychological battery and were determined to be cognitively healthy. The mean age of these participants was 74.5 years (SD = 8.3), and there were 36 who met the threshold for the amyloid/tau ratio associated with Alzheimer's disease (PAT) while the other 79 did not (NAT). A hierarchical linear regression tested the hypotheses, with two blocks used for the analyses. Block 1 for both analyses contained variables to control for the potential effects of various factors in performance on the Long Delay tasks. Block 2 consisted of the amyloid groups (NAT vs. PAT). Results: After controlling for age, sex, education, body mass index, Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, and depression, we found no significant difference between CVLT-II Long Delay Free Recall scores or Long Delay Cued Recall scores for the two groups. Conclusions: While no significant difference was found on the long delay trials of the CVLT-II, it is important to note that it is unclear at what stage Alzheimer's related decline begins or can be detected using cognitive testing. Longitudinal studies would help to better understand if this lack of association holds true over time. Other aspects of the CVLT-II, such as intrusions and repetitions, would also help to better understand the different ways that symptoms of Alzheimer's disease can manifest early on.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the International Neuropsychological SocietySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207