MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390095668 · doi:10.59254/sbpo-2018-85285

Meta-heurística híbrida aplicada ao Problema das Sequências Justas Ponderadas

2018· article· pt· W4390095668 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa Operacional · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Mathematical Programming
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Weighted Fair Sequences Problem (WFSP) is an optimization problem that has been recently defined in the literature.It covers a large number of applications in different areas, ranging from automobile production on a mixed-model assembly line to the sequencing of interactive applications to be aired in a Digital TV environment.The WFSP, which is part of the class of scheduling problems called fair sequences, was proved to be NP-hard by Pessoa et al. (2018), and an iterative solution method was proposed for it.This paper proposes a hybrid metaheuristic for the WFSP and makes an analysis on the intrinsic difficulties of the problem.Computational experiments show that the proposed metaheuristic is able to find solutions with the same quality of the iterative method in much less computational time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it