Social Inequalities in Child Health : Type 1 Diabetes, Obesity, Cardiovascular Risk Factors and the Role of Self-control

The Swedish Commission on Health Inequality defined health inequality as systematic differences in health between groups in society with different social positions. All avoidable socioeconomic health inequalities are unfair, and as stated by WHO's Commission on the Social Determinants of Health, we have a moral obligation to try to reduce them. "Putting these inequities right is a matter of social justice. Reducing health inequities is, for the Commission on Social Determinants of Health, an ethical imperative." This ethical imperative is especially apparent regarding the health of children and adolescents. Children’s right to the highest attainable standard of health is also enshrined in Article 24 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. To reach the goal of a reduction of health inequalities, research is necessary to describe the social gradients of health. Research is also needed to better understand why these gradients occur. A better understanding and knowledge about health inequalities can lead to policies that reduce these inequalities and ensure children’s right to health. This thesis investigates social inequality in child health using data from a Swedish population-based prospective birth cohort, the All Babies in Southeast Sweden (ABIS) cohort. Social inequality in obesity in the ABIS cohort is also compared with other birth cohorts participating in the Elucidating Pathways to Child Health Inequality (EPOCH) collaboration which includes cohorts from six high-income countries; Sweden, the Netherlands, Canada (one national and one cohort from Quebec), UK, Australia, and USA. In Paper 1 we show that health inequalities in overweight and obesity are detectable already at two years of age and that these inequalities increase during childhood. In adolescents, low socioeconomic status increases the risk of becoming overweight and the risk of components of the metabolic syndrome, including high blood pressure and dyslipidemia (low high-density cholesterol). The level of inequality in obesity in the Swedish ABIS cohort was lower than in the other participating countries in the EPOCH collaboration (Paper 2). Inequality was lower in absolute and relative terms when SES was measured by household income. Inequality was also lower in absolute, but not relative, terms when SES was measured by maternal education. This finding indicates that some of the policies implemented in Sweden may attenuate social inequalities in obesity in children. Examples of such policies with evidence for reducing social inequality in obesity implemented in Sweden include universal preschools and free school meals. This thesis also investigates health inequalities in autoimmune disease (Paper 3). In this study, we found that low socioeconomic status increased the risk of Type 1 Diabetes but not the other autoimmune diseases investigated. Path analysis indicated that part of the increased risk in children with low SES of Type 1 Diabetes might be mediated by a higher body mass index and an elevated risk of serious life events. In the final paper, this thesis tests the hypothesis that differences in maternal and child self-control mediate social inequalities in obesity. Two measures of self-control were used; for mothers, the self-control variable was based on behaviors related to self-control (smoking during pregnancy, smoking during the child’s first year of life, breastfeeding duration, and participating in the ABIS study with biological samples). For the children, the self-control variable was based on questionnaire data on the impulsivity subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The results showed that the two measures of self-control mediated 87.5 % of the increased risk of obesity at age 19 years in children with low maternal education and 93 % of the risk if maternal BMI was also included in the selfcontrol variable. In the discussion part of this thesis, the conclusions that can be deduced from understanding the mechanisms of social inequality in child health are discussed. A theory with a central role of self-control for health inequality predicts that social inequality will increase without interventions. In an environment with rising numbers of stimuli of the human reward system, stimuli that also have negative long-term consequences (socalled Limbic traps), child and adolescent health, in general, will decrease. Because of the mechanisms related to SES and self-control, children with low SES will be disproportionally affected. The result of this development will be increasing levels of social inequalities in child health. The discussion also includes implications for policies that may improve health and reduce inequalities. These policies should reduce the exposure of children and adolescents to harmful behaviors/limbic traps. Examples of policies that have this effect include universal preschools for all children, free healthy meals in preschools and schools, increased after-school activities for all children, and longer school days for adolescents with increased hours for physical activity, music, and art. Mobile phones and social media restrictions in schools and policies to reduce use at home should also be implemented. Finally, policies should be implemented to reduce residential and school segregation in the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.