Computing linear sections of varieties: quantum entanglement, tensor decompositions and beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the problem of finding elements in the intersection of an arbitrary conic variety in $\mathbb{F}^{n}$ with a given linear subspace (where $\mathbb{F}$ can be the real or complex field). This problem captures a rich family of algorithmic problems under different choices of the variety. The special case of the variety consisting of rank-1 matrices already has strong connections to central problems in different areas like quantum information theory and tensor decompositions. This problem is known to be NP-hard in the worst case, even for the variety of rank-1 matrices.In this work, we propose and analyze an algorithm for solving this problem. Surprisingly, despite the above hardness results we show that our algorithm solves this problem efficiently for “typical” subspaces. Here, the subspace $\mathcal{U} \subseteq \mathbb{F}^{n}$ is chosen generically of a certain dimension, potentially with some generic elements of the variety contained in it. Our main result is a guarantee that our algorithm recovers all the elements of $\mathcal{U}$ that lie in the variety, under some mild non-degeneracy assumptions on the variety. As corollaries, we obtain the following new results:•Polynomial time algorithms for several entangled subspaces problems in quantum entanglement, including determining r-entanglement, complete entanglement, and genuine entanglement of a subspace. While all of these problems are NP-hard in the worst case, our algorithm solves them in polynomial time for generic subspaces of dimension up to a constant multiple of the maximum possible.•Uniqueness results and polynomial time algorithmic guarantees for generic instances of a broad class of low-rank decomposition problems that go beyond tensor decompositions. Here, we recover a decomposition of the form $\sum_{i=1}^{R} v_{i} \otimes w_{i}$, where the $v_{i}$ are elements of the given variety $\mathcal{X}$. This implies new uniqueness results and genericity guarantees even in the special case of tensor decompositions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".