MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Study on Transmission Line Protection Using Incident Current

2023· article· en· W4390098269 on OpenAlexaff
Enwu Xu, H. Wang, Yi Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsRTDS Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission lineElectric power transmissionTransient (computer programming)Superposition principleElectronic engineeringElectrical impedanceFault (geology)Protective relayTransmission (telecommunications)Digital protective relayFilter (signal processing)Line (geometry)Power-system protectionComputer scienceRelayElectric power systemElectrical engineeringCharacteristic impedancePower (physics)EngineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern traveling wave-based (TW-based) protection solutions for transmission lines have been increasingly adopted in real-world power systems. Among various methods, the Differentiator Smoother (DS) filter is a mature signal processing technique, relying on high-frequency sampled data, and has been used in commercially available TW-based relays. The DS filtering technique extracts the transients, related to fault-induced TWs in the measured currents, which are a superposition of the incident and reflected waves. The magnitude of this transient, which is dependent on the termination characteristics of the transmission line, could be very small, if the termination impedance is significantly higher than the characteristic impedance of the transmission line, potentially resulting in poor accuracy in fault location estimation. In this paper, a study on Transmission Line Protection based on the incident current is presented. Real-time simulations are performed using RTDS® real-time digital simulator to compare the incident current-based method with the existing DS-based solution. The results prove a great potential to incorporate such an incident-current based TW protection solution into commercially available TW-based relays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207