Energetic driving force for LHCII clustering in plant membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plants capture and convert solar energy in a complex network of membrane proteins. Under high light, the luminal pH drops and induces a reorganization of the protein network, particularly clustering of the major light-harvesting complex (LHCII). While the structures of the network have been resolved in exquisite detail, the thermodynamics that control the assembly and reorganization had not been determined, largely because the interaction energies of membrane proteins have been inaccessible. Here, we describe a method to quantify these energies and its application to LHCII. Using single-molecule measurements, LHCII proteoliposomes, and statistical thermodynamic modeling, we quantified the LHCII-LHCII interaction energy as ~−5 k B T at neutral pH and at least −7 k B T at acidic pH. These values revealed an enthalpic thermodynamic driving force behind LHCII clustering. Collectively, this work captures the interactions that drive the organization of membrane protein networks from the perspective of equilibrium statistical thermodynamics, which has a long and rich tradition in biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".