MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390099049 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi1899

Three-dimensional thermophotonic super-resolution imaging by spatiotemporal diffusion reversal method

2023· article· en· W4390099049 on OpenAlexaff
Damber Thapa, Pantea Tavakolian, George Zhou, Alan Zhang, Asser Abdelgawad, Elnaz Baradaran Shokouhi, Koneswaran Sivagurunathan, Andreas Mandelis

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage resolutionDeconvolutionOptical coherence tomographyOpticsPoint spread functionPhotothermal therapyOptical tomographyMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial super-resolution in thermophotonic imaging was achieved using a combination of spatial second-derivative forming, spatial gradient adaptive filtering, and Richardson-Lucy deconvolution in conjunction with the construction of an experimental point spread function. When implemented through enhanced truncation-correlation photothermal coherence tomography (eTC-PCT), it was possible to restore blurred infrared thermophotonic images to their prediffusion optical resolution state. This modality was tested in various biological applications and proved to be capable of imaging fine axial cracks in human teeth, well-patterned anatomical subsurface structures of a mouse brain, and neovascularization in a mouse thigh due to the rapid proliferation of cancer cells. This modality was found to be immune to optical scattering and could reveal the true spatial extent of biological features at subsurface depths that conventional thermal imaging cannot reach because of limitations imposed by the physics of spreading diffusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207