Epidemiology and Outcomes of Neonatal Meningitis: Results of the Turkish Neo-Meningitis Nationwide Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and etiology of neonatal meningitis and to assess the associated risk factors, complications and outcomes in a nationwide multicenter retrospective descriptive study. METHOD: Twenty-seven centers from 7 geographical regions participated in the study. Newborns with a positive cerebrospinal fluid culture and/or cerebrospinal fluid polymerase chain reaction were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, clinical, laboratory and neuroimaging findings and mortality characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 634 confirmed cases of neonatal meningitis were included in the final analysis. The incidence was 2.51 per 1000 intensive care unit hospitalizations and mortality was observed in 149 (23.5%). Gram-positive bacteria were the predominant pathogens (54.5%), with coagulase-negative Staphylococci accounting for 45.3% of the cases, followed by Gram-negative organisms (37.3%). Viral and fungal organisms were isolated in 3.2% and 1.7% of the infants, respectively. Gram-negative culture growth was more common in infants who died (51% vs. 34.6%; P < 0.001). In the multivariable model, the odds of mortality was higher in those with respiratory distress requiring invasive ventilatory support [odds ratio (OR): 10.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.9-21.7; P < 0.01], hypotension requiring inotropes (OR: 4.4; 95% CI: 2.7-7.1; P < 0.001), low birth weight status (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4-4.6; P = 0.002), lack of exposure to antenatal steroids (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3-4.4; P = 0.005) and the presence of concomitant sepsis (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1-3.2; P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, neonatal meningitis was found to be associated with high mortality. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci was the most common causative microorganism followed by Gram-negative bacteria. Severe clinical presentation with invasive mechanical ventilation and inotrope requirement, as well as concomitant sepsis, low birth weight status and lack of exposure to antenatal steroids, were found to be independent risk factors for mortality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".