Bilateral Teleoperation Control Using Unified Interactive Model for Manipulation in Contact Environment<sup>*</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a novel bilateral teleoperation control is designed specifically for manipulation in contact environment. Firstly, serval interaction conditions (e.g., free motion and rigid interaction) are defined and unified into one equation as the designed unified interactive model, which can also be utilized as a control objective. Based on this model, a remote hybrid motion/force controller is designed for remote robot, which achieves the good position and force tracking, and ensures the precise and safe contact force that helps reduce the workload of operator. Subsequently, the contact force is reconstructed in the local side by estimating and transmitting the non-power environment coefficient from remote side, which provides the operator with accurate force feedback. Since the coefficient replaces the direct transmission of force signal in the communication channel, the traditional power-cycle problem is essentially avoided, which guarantees the stability of teleoperation system under communication time delays. Comparative experiments are implemented to verify the effectiveness of proposed method for teleoperated manipulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".