Kidwai, H., Iyengar, R., Witenstein, M. A., Byker, E. J., & Setty, R. (2018). Participatory Action Research and Educational Development South Asian Perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
South Asian Perspectives is a comprehensive collection of reflexive research projects which aims to address the following key questions: "What is the work involved in enacting PAR?What kinds of opportunities might researchers face and what kinds of problems will they need to solve?What would it take to solve the problems and leverage the opportunities in a way that promotes social justice and transforms the context and the players?" (Kidwai, Iyengar, Witenstein, Byker, & Setty, 2018, p. 275).While each article included in this volume makes a significant contribution to broader understandings of PAR, the book as a whole is wonderfully and intentionally curated to explore PAR in practice, delving into the diverse nuances and complex challenges inherent to PAR methodologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".