Symbolic revolution on the Maidan: the case of the “iolka”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article is devoted to the history of one of the most famous symbols of the Revolution of Dignity – the metal frame of an artificial Christmas tree (iolka, as it was called) erected on the Maidan. The study has two purposes: on one hand, to examine the process of transforming a symbol from a verbal one to a substantive one and from something negative to something positive. This process is linked to the protesters’ creation of a new symbolic space and a new symbolic system. On the other hand, the Christmas tree structure is considered as an artifact of the Maidan, the constituent elements of which, having influenced the process of symbol formation, can be analyzed as a distinctive historical source. These elements include the flags, posters, and banners that participants in the Revolution of Dignity affixed to the frame of the Christmas tree. The study of these artifacts, some of which are stored in the National Museum of the Revolution of Dignity, provides indirect information about the protesters and their views on the socio-political processes occurring in the country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".