İnternet ve Otonom Dil Öğrenimi Bağlamında Alloprof Sitesinin Çözümlenmesi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet tools, which are widely used today for distance education and individual (autonomous) learning purposes, also allow their users to utilize many applications in the field of foreign language teaching/learning.In this regard, it is observed that a significant number of websites have been designed for the teaching/learning of major languages spoken worldwide.With increased Internet speed, enhanced specifications, diversified tools/platforms, and the growing number of people using the Internet, the number of such websites is rapidly expanding.This study thus aims to analyze the French language teaching module of the Alloprof, designed as an extracurricular digital learning platform to assist allophone students (those whose first language is not English or French) attending primary and secondary education in the province of Quebec, Canada) with their lessons and assignments.The analysis was conducted within the framework of language teaching methods, approaches, and principles.In this study, based on the scanning model, document analysis, a qualitative research method, was employed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it