Decoherence limiting the cost to simulate an anharmonic oscillator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study how decoherence increases the efficiency with which we can simulate the quantum dynamics of an anharmonic oscillator governed by the Kerr effect. As decoherence washes out the fine-grained sub-Planck structure associated with phase-space quantum interference in the closed quantum system, open quantum dynamics can be more efficiently simulated using a coarse-grained finite-difference numerical integration. We tie this to the way in which decoherence recovers the semiclassical truncated Wigner approximation, which strongly differs from the exact closed-system dynamics at times when quantum interference leads to cat states and more general superpositions of coherent states. The regression in quadrature measurement statistics to semiclassical dynamics becomes more pronounced as the initial amplitude of the oscillator grows, with implications for the quantum advantage that might be accessible as system size grows in noisy quantum devices. Lastly, we show that this regression does not have the form of a convex noise model, such as for a depolarizing noise channel. Instead, closed quantum system effects interact with the open-system effects, giving rise to distinct open-system behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".