Comparative evaluation of bite pressure and electromyographic activity of temporalis and masseter muscles between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients after prosthetic rehabilitation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AMA Chowdhur A, Singh S, Chand P, et al. Comparative evaluation of bite pressure and electromyographic activity of temporalis and masseter muscles between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients after prosthetic rehabilitation. Journal of Stomatology. 2023;76(4):235-241. doi:10.5114/jos.2023.133639. APA Chowdhur, A., Singh, S., Chand, P., Singh, K., Arya, D., & Malhotra, H. et al. (2023). Comparative evaluation of bite pressure and electromyographic activity of temporalis and masseter muscles between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients after prosthetic rehabilitation. Journal of Stomatology, 76(4), 235-241. https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2023.133639 Chicago Chowdhur, Adrita Roy, Saumyendra Vikram Singh, Pooran Chand, Kamleshwar Singh, Deeksha Arya, Hardeep Singh Malhotra, and Puneet Kumar. 2023. "Comparative evaluation of bite pressure and electromyographic activity of temporalis and masseter muscles between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients after prosthetic rehabilitation". Journal of Stomatology 76 (4): 235-241. doi:10.5114/jos.2023.133639. Harvard Chowdhur, A., Singh, S., Chand, P., Singh, K., Arya, D., Malhotra, H., and Kumar, P. (2023). Comparative evaluation of bite pressure and electromyographic activity of temporalis and masseter muscles between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients after prosthetic rehabilitation. Journal of Stomatology, 76(4), pp.235-241. https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2023.133639 MLA Chowdhur, Adrita Roy et al. "Comparative evaluation of bite pressure and electromyographic activity of temporalis and masseter muscles between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients after prosthetic rehabilitation." Journal of Stomatology, vol. 76, no. 4, 2023, pp. 235-241. doi:10.5114/jos.2023.133639. Vancouver Chowdhur A, Singh S, Chand P, Singh K, Arya D, Malhotra H et al. Comparative evaluation of bite pressure and electromyographic activity of temporalis and masseter muscles between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients after prosthetic rehabilitation. Journal of Stomatology. 2023;76(4):235-241. doi:10.5114/jos.2023.133639.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it