Nekateri vidiki začetkov slovenskega zavoda v Rimu – odmevi med slovenskimi izseljenci po svetu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nekateri vidiki začetkov slovenskega zavoda v Rimu -odmevi med slovenskimi izseljenci po svetu Some Features of the Slovenian College's Beginnings in Rome -Echoes Among the Slovenian Emigrants Around the WorldIzvleček: Kot mnogi drugi katoliški narodi so si tudi člani Katoliške cerkve na Slovenskem po koncu prve svetovne vojne želeli zavod v središču krščanstva, ki bi nudil gostoljubnost slovenskim romarjem v večnem mestu in možnost bivanja slovenskim študentom v času specialističnega študija ter bi skrbel za ohranjanje slovenske verske in kulture zunaj matične domovine.Slovenski zavod v Rimu je bil uradno ustanovljen leta 1960, dejansko pa je zaživel v letu 1973.Takrat je bil tudi uvrščen med papeške zavode.Ustanovitev so finančno podprli predvsem slovenski politični izseljenci iz Združenih držav Amerike in Kanade, ki pa so imeli pomisleke glede značaja zavoda, njegovega vodstva in neodvisnosti od komunističnih oblasti v Sloveniji.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".