MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390120988 · doi:10.33524/cjar.v20i1.451

Call for Proposals for 2020 Conference Now Open! The Action Research Network of the Americas

2019· article· en· W4390120988 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
The Action Research Network of the Americas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Action Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicE-Learning and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCall to actionTheme (computing)Action (physics)Library scienceMedia studiesPolitical sciencePublic relationsSociologyWorld Wide WebComputer scienceBusinessAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After a very successful and inspiring #ARNA2019 conference in Montreal, Québec, Canada this past June, we are excited to begin planning for Peurto Vallarta, Mexico in 2020! This of course all starts with a call for proposals. We encourage you and your colleagues to submit an abstract that you think works well within the theme: Co-creando conocimiento, empoderando a la comunidad / Co-creating knowledge and empowering communities. 
 Submission Guidelines can be found at www.arnawebsite.org/call-for-proposals and your opportunity to submit will be open until March 1, 2020. Once you have reviewed the guidelines, use the linked Google Form to submit your proposal.
 We look forward to your submission and seeing you at #ARNA2020 in Mexico!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.310
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Action ResearchSame topicE-Learning and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207