A hybrid genetic algorithm with variable neighborhood search for batch dispersion problem to improve traceability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Batch dispersion problem (BDP) restricts batch traceability in large-scale discrete production and negatively impacts batch recall costs. However, previous research has ignored the complexity of the BDP in their analyses. This paper investigates the BDP under the composed bill of materials (BOM) and develops a mathematical model for the BDP with the goal of minimizing the total batch dispersion by utilizing the batch dispersion as a measure of the degree of dispersed usage of part batches. BDP-GAVNS, a hybrid genetic algorithm with variable neighborhood search, is devised for the BDP based on the demonstration that the BDP is an NPC problem. In BDP-GAVNS, memory banks were introduced to increase the diversity of individuals performing crossover operations. Additionally, the encoding method and infeasible solution repair program are designed according to the characteristics of BDP. Numerical experiments validate the viability and effectiveness of BDP-GAVNS in solving BDP. They demonstrate that (1) the optimal combination occurs when the ratio of individuals produced by the three types of population initialization methods, namely global selection (GS), local selection (LS), and random selection (RS), to the population takes values of 0.30, 0.10, and 0.60, respectively; (2) The memory bank enriches the source of individuals required for crossover operations and improves the performance of crossover operations; and (3) The BDP-GAVNS is more effective than the other five heuristic algorithms including genetic algorithms in seeking the optimal solution of BDP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".